Comparing the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire Essay -- Han Dynasty vs

The Han Dynasty and the papist Empire were two expansive empires that rose out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over immense areas. The collapse of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came later a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the semipolitical disorder that stemmed from the early dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the some other hand, the rise of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and preponderant the democratic elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of citizen as subjects to the Roman emperor. Both empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political dominance however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and royal expansionist natures diverged.Both the Han and Roman empires emphasized on territorial expansions. By utilizing their powerful militaries, they consolidated their power within and across borders, which created stable apportion networks for their economic bases. Land equated to wealth and power. Through integration of the local domains, twain empires succeeded in political stability. For the Han Empire, their expansion abroad pushed through ecological limits to a lower place Emperor Wu Di ( 181-87 BCE), who made multitude service compulsory. The army expanded touch into northern Vietnam and southeastern China. Although there were military threats from the Xiongnu, the nomadic people of the north, Wu launched disproof attacks that made ... ... weaker state will remain neutral from a military strength. Melians loss reaffirms the absolute power of imperial conquests and nationalism in theories of realism. Since the Melians were confederate with the Spartans and failed to cooperate, it is justifiable that the Athenians had the right to want to rule and invade the Melians as way of life to protect their own strengths.Works CitedGochberg, Donald S. World Literature and Thought. Fort Worth, TX Harcourt College, 1997. Print.Pomeranz, Kenneth, crowd together Buchanan. Given, Laura Jane Mitchell, and Robert L. Tignor.Worlds Together, Worlds Apart A Companion Reader. New York W.W. Norton &, 2011. Print.Polybius, Rome at the residue of the Punic Wars. Ancient History SourcebookPoetry of the Han DynastyThucydides, The Melian DebateTung Chung-Shu, luxuriant Gems of the Spring and Autumn Annals.